Skip to main content

AI & Intelligence

Practice Analytics

Your practice's financial reality, made visible — payer mix, provider productivity, service line profitability, and where revenue leaks.

The analytics workbench

Three views your PM system has never shown you

Payer mix · share of collections

$318K

monthly

  • Commercial42%
  • Medicare28%
  • Medicaid / MCO17%
  • Self-pay13%

Yield per encounter varies 22% across these payers — mix strategy is revenue strategy.

Provider productivity · wRVU vs. MGMA median

Dr. Rivera5,940 wRVU
Dr. Chen5,110 wRVU
Dr. Okafor4,010 wRVU
A. Marsh, NP3,180 wRVU

Tick marks show the MGMA specialty median — context that turns numbers into conversations.

Service line profitability

  • Office visits (E/M)+38%
  • Preventive & AWV+44%
  • In-office procedures+29%
  • Bracing & DME−6%
Analyst note: DME margin turned negative in March after supplier price change — renegotiate or repriced by June.

Want this running on your practice's data? A live walkthrough takes 30 minutes.

Book a live demo

Business outcomes

What this changes for your organization

Practice Analytics · performance standards

measured continuously

revenue levers analyzed monthly

12+

benchmark comparisons standard

MGMA

monthly narrative review, not just dashboards

1

Performance standards we operate to. Actual results vary by specialty, payer mix, and starting position — your free assessment establishes your own baseline.

See where revenue actually comes from

Payer mix, yield per encounter, and service-line profitability — the questions your PM reports can't answer, answered monthly.

Provider performance without the guesswork

wRVU productivity benchmarked against MGMA data for your specialty — objective, fair, and finally comparable across providers.

Decisions backed by your own data

Add a service line? Drop a payer? Extend hours? Analytics turns gut-feel decisions into modeled ones with dollar estimates attached.

Insight with a human attached

A named analyst reviews your data every month and tells you the three things worth acting on — numbers with narrative, not chart dumps.

Our solution

Most practice management systems bury insight under a hundred canned reports nobody opens. Our analytics service turns your raw billing data into a clear operating picture: where revenue comes from, where it leaks, and what to do about both.

We analyze payer mix and reimbursement per encounter, provider productivity against benchmarks, service line profitability, referral patterns, and capacity utilization — delivered as a monthly review with recommendations, not just charts.

What's included

  • Payer mix and yield-per-encounter analysis
  • Provider productivity benchmarking (wRVU)
  • Service line profitability modeling
  • Denial and write-off trend analysis
  • Scheduling and capacity utilization review
  • Monthly insight review with recommendations

In the field

How organizations like yours use it

USE CASE 01

A family practice discovered its best payer was its smallest

Yield-per-encounter analysis showed a regional payer reimbursing 22% above the practice's average. A targeted marketing push toward that network lifted monthly revenue without adding hours.

USE CASE 02

An orthopedic group repriced its worst service line

Service-line modeling revealed bracing and DME running at a loss after supply costs. Renegotiated pricing and a workflow change turned a $40K annual drag into a contributor.

USE CASE 03

A pediatric group ended its scheduling bottleneck

Capacity analysis showed Tuesday/Thursday utilization at 96% while Mondays ran at 61%. Template changes recovered ~30 appointment slots a week — pure found revenue.

Scenarios drawn from typical engagement patterns; identifying details anonymized to protect client confidentiality.

Common questions

Practice Analytics, answered

Related

More in AI & Intelligence

Ready to fix practice analytics for good?

Start with a free consultation and billing health check. A senior consultant will look at your numbers and give you a straight answer about what we can improve — and by how much.